Showing posts with label British English. Show all posts
Showing posts with label British English. Show all posts

Sunday, 7 April 2013


Want to stay in love? Then DON'T live together. As more and more couples live apart, is this the death of romance? On the contrary, says novelist Deborah Moggach





Ten of the happiest years of my life were spent not living with the man I loved. A couple of times a week, I would cycle to his Soho bedsit, carrying my trusty sponge bag. 
So keen was I to preserve my independence that I didn’t even leave a toothbrush there.
We would spend the evening together and in the morning eat breakfast at a nearby cafe, chatting to his friends. 
Then I would bike back to my home in Camden, North London, and start my day’s work, writing. This carried on for a decade, unchanged and blissful, until he died 19 years ago. 
According to a recent survey, 23 per cent of couples - that's 2.2 million people - in a serious relationship live apart, whether by choice or circumstance, and this number is growing rapidly
According to a recent survey, 23 per cent of couples - that's 2.2 million people - in a serious relationship live apart, whether by choice or circumstance, and this number is growing rapidly
We loved each other to bits, but I don’t think it even crossed our minds to move in together. We certainly never talked about it.
At the start, I was newly divorced with small children, and he — the cartoonist Mel Calman — was the veteran of two marriages. We bore the scars of prolonged co-habitation and had no desire to jump into domesticity again.
It soon became clear our unconventional arrangement worked for us and we had no desire to change it.
Mel had his own life — 18 years older than me, he never wanted to leave his beloved bachelor pad and move somewhere big enough for two, let alone a house with room for a family.
 
And it wasn’t all one-way. I had my life, which centred on my two children and writing novels.
I loved being a parent with them and a vamp with him; apart from the fact it was fun, keeping the two parts of my life separate avoided all sorts of tensions and problems.
I don’t think our relationship would have survived if we had moved in together: he would have got annoyed at my children’s mess and the way I brought them up. I think he thought me a slapdash and indulgent parent, though he was far too wise to tell me so.
Nor might we have survived my children’s hostility towards him as the cause of my divorce from their father, though this tension eased as the years passed. Besides, he’d already had a set of stepchildren and I didn’t want to inflict all that on him a second time.
While some of our friends thought our set-up was strange, it turns out we were trendsetters.
Famously, actress Helena Bonham Carter and her director husband Tim Burton, live in adjacent London homes
Famously, actress Helena Bonham Carter and her director husband Tim Burton, live in adjacent London homes
According to a recent survey, 23 per cent of couples — that’s 2.2 million people — in a serious relationship live apart, whether by choice or circumstance, and this number is growing rapidly. 
Indeed, the number of men and women ‘living apart together’ has increased by 40 per cent in the past decade. Famously, they include the actress Helena Bonham Carter and her director husband Tim Burton, who live in adjacent London homes.
Research suggests young couples live apart because they don’t want to sacrifice their independence, while those who are older have accumulated too many possessions to fit in one property.
But I think there are myriad reasons why living apart appeals to so many. There are women who have worked hard and don’t want to risk losing their savings when an ill-judged cohabitation goes wrong, and men who value their independence — and vice versa.
I know several couples who live apart and prefer it that way. This especially applies to those who have got together later in life, when each person is more likely to be set in their ways and less willing to adapt.
They’re surrounded by their own stuff with no room for anyone else’s. Some have emerged from a long marriage and are scared to commit or just reluctant to return to domesticity. Others have grandchildren nearby and don’t want to uproot themselves. 
They’ve done the marriage thing; falling in love again recaptures something of their carefree youth, so why not keep it carefree?
Having two homes is also an escape valve. One couple I know, who have been together for seven years, work from home and divide their time between her flat in London and his cottage in Hastings, East Sussex. Sometimes they go together, sometimes separately. 
‘What’s vital is that we each have our own space and know it’s there if we need it,’ they say.  
I’m not scared of commitment or sharing my finances, but I’m terrified of domesticity. After Mel died, I did live with someone. My children had grown up, I was a free agent and my boyfriend needed somewhere to live.

So I bought a house and we renovated it together — a passion killer if ever there was one. What began as a fine romance ended with us trailing round Homebase looking at bathroom fittings. Our love affair died of a slow puncture, in a cloud of plaster dust.

DID YOU KNOW?

Two-thirds of couples argue over chores at least once a week
I missed the thrill of impermanence that separate homes had brought to my relationship with Mel. When we were together, at a stroke I could have vanished from his life, leaving no trace. Unlike my next boyfriend, there were no rows about chores.
In a two-home arrangement, you are a guest in the other person’s house and guests are more polite. Better still, you don’t have all those conversations about the guttering and bills and who’s phoning the plumber.
Nor do you build up resentments about doing more than your fair share of the washing up. Domesticity is a relationship killer. 
People nowadays seem to move in together very quickly, but I think you should have a long, hard look before you jump into buying a bed together, because sharing a home changes a relationship.
For a start, you no longer get to enjoy romantic arrivals and departures. 

When you don’t live together you always kiss when you’re reunited and you have lots of stored up news. You don’t take each other for granted. You dress up for each other rather than slobbing around in a tracksuit.
After all, that tracksuit is waiting for you at home, when you can flop about, read trashy magazines, revert to your other self.
You can see the friends your other half dislikes and do the things he doesn’t like doing. You can go to a gallery while he goes to the football; catch up with TV programmes you want to watch; and do stomach exercises without inflicting the sight on your lover.
Independence is fun, especially when there’s a beloved waiting in the wings, and freedom makes you a more interesting person. Having separate lives brings fresh air into a relationship.
Living apart means you don't build up resentments about doing more than your fair share of the washing up; domesticity is a relationship killer
[caption
A chap’s annoying habits are far less annoying when you know he’ll be gone tomorrow. 
I like missing someone and being missed; I like looking forward to seeing him again. I like getting emails and texts with lots of xxx’s.
And, most importantly, I do believe we can’t expect another person to be everything to us. Even in the greatest love affair there are parts of you the other person doesn’t nourish.
Living together places a huge burden on the other person to be lover, friend, entertainments manager, chef, domestic help, which is almost impossible and can lead to disappointment. 
If you don’t live together, you spend more time with other people and ease the pressure off your lover. 

So, I’m sure that the number of couples living apart will only increase in the future. After all, we’re living longer and likely to have several relationships rather than one long one. 
I'm sure that the number of couples living apart will only increase in the future. After all, we're living longer and likely to have several relationships rather than one long one
I'm sure that the number of couples living apart will only increase in the future. After all, we're living longer and likely to have several relationships rather than one long one
It doesn’t suit everyone, of course. Living apart is hardly possible if people have children together. It can also be more expensive to maintain two homes. But then it’s expensive to break up when you live in one property. 
Today, I’m involved with someone who lives in Wales. We’ve been together three years and see each other every weekend, splitting our time between his home and mine in London. 
And again it works. He’s never had a family, so why should he be interested in my two grandchildren? 
They’re my other love affair, deep and intense, and nothing to do with him. 

I can roll around on the floor playing with them without looking at my watch.  And I like being myself sometimes, rather than half of a couple.
All this might alter, however, as the years pass. I’m 64 and don’t want to become really old alone. At some point, no doubt, I’ll long to hunker down with someone, gnarled hand in gnarled hand. 
Sometimes that vision fills me with claustrophobia; just recently, however, it’s been starting to sound rather nice.

Who knows what will happen ten years from now? With matters of the heart, you never can tell. 
If there’s one thing I’ve learned, it is that love, like life, never turns out quite as we planned. 

Heartbreak Hotel by Deborah Moggach  (Chatto, £13.99).


Saturday, 6 April 2013

Portuguese football cop beats Newcastle United fan, aged SEVEN, with riot baton

The youngster was one of 3,500 Toon Army supporters penned in after the final whistle in Lisbon on Thursday following the game against Benfica
Newcastle fans attacked
Newcastle fans attacked
A seven-year-old football fan was allegedly hit with a steel baton by a Portuguese cop at a Europa League game, the Sunday People has reported.
The lad was one of 3,500 Newcastle United supporters penned in after the final whistle in Lisbon on Thursday.
As tempers rose at the delay, mobile phone footage captured the moment one cop in full riot gear began swinging his baton at fans – some children.
The film shows the lad fall backwards from the blow before being quickly surrounded by protective adult fans.
One shouts, “He’s a f****** child, man”, another points to his head to indicate where the boy was hit and boos erupt.
Other riot officers waded in after the cop appeared to react to being touched on the head.
Newcastle fan Jimmy Archer, 47, said: “They were whacking everybody at random. I got hit twice and all I had said was, ‘Stop’.
Newcastle fans attacked
One supporter points to his head to show where the young lad was attacked
 “After we’d left the ground people talked of a young lad being hit. It was crazy. It all ended as soon as it began and there’d been no reason for it. Nobody was throwing punches or anything.”
Fan Michael Lowdon said: “The police took no account of the fact we were penned in.
“There was pushing going on and I think the police just snapped and brought out the batons. It was really scary.”
It is thought the unidentified boy went with his dad to the game against Benfica, which Newcastle lost 3-1.
After the match away fans were allowed to swap scarves and shirts with Benfica supporters but were then kept back by police.
Later, fans of the Premier League club went on social network sites to tell of the attack. One claimed he witnessed the lad being hit.
Newcastle United said: “We encourage the boy’s father to make a formal complaint to the Portuguese police.”
Match commander Valente Pinho said: “We sent officers in to avoid any trouble between fans. I think we did it well.”

Check out all the latest News, Sport & Celeb gossip at Mirror.co.uk Portuguese football cop beats Newcastle United fan, aged SEVEN, with riot baton - Mirror Online
Follow us: @DailyMirror on Twitter | DailyMirror on Facebook
Go Camping for 95p! Vouchers collectable in the Daily and Sunday Mirror until 11th August

Friday, 5 April 2013


Beckham criticism strange and unfair say PSG boss Ancelotti


113 VIEWS0 COMMENTS
Beckham criticism strange and unfair say PSG boss Ancelotti
Paris Saint-Germain coach Carlo Ancelotti on Friday rounded on critics of David Beckham for his performance in the Champions League quarter-final first leg match against Barcelona.
"Criticism of Beckham is strange and unfair. He had a very good match. He followed the strategy I laid out to the letter and gave the ball quickly," the Italian told a news conference.
"Did the way he played make me want to start with him again in the second leg? Yes, of course it did. If Paris were good in the first half-hour against Barca it's because Beckham was good as he looked to play quickly."
Ancelotti was speaking after assessments that the 37-year-old former England captain, who started the game but was substituted after 70 minutes in the 2-2 draw, played the long ball well but fell short when it came to winning it.
Others have raised questions about whether PSG's Qatari owners pressurised Ancelotti into starting with the former Manchester United and Real Madrid midfielder for commercial reasons.
But the coach said: "It's wrong to say that Qatar told me, 'Beckham must play'...
Club presidents can't force a coach to pick a player...
"During my career, no president has forced me to pick a player, whether it's (AC Milan president Silvio) Berlusconi, (Chelsea owner Roman) Abramovich or Nasser (al-Khelaifi, PSG's majority shareholder).
"It annoys me that anyone can think that," he said.
He added: "I'm not a friend of Beckham or a supporter. I try to be objective. A player doesn't play if he's not good in training. Beckham deserves to play even if he's 37 years old.
"I've got one aim only: get PSG to win something, whether it's the French championship, French cup, or even, dare I say it, the Champions League."

Read more: football.co.uk

Is the Facebook phone a flop? Zuckerberg's big mobile idea slammed by critics

  • Critics say new system is simply a way to show users more adverts
  • Fears new software 'erodes any idea of privacy'




Facebook's plans to 'take over' user's mobile phones with new software have come under fire.
Billed as the social networking giant's 'big idea', the Home software unveiled by Mark Zuckerberg at the firm's Silicon Valley HQ last night has already had a rough ride.
Om Malik from tech news website GigaOm said it 'erodes any idea of privacy,' while Wired magazine described it as a 'triumph of mediocrity.'
SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO
Michael Goodwin of FTC shows off the first mobile phone, which will be preloaded with Facebook's new Home app when it goes on sale later this months
Michael Goodwin of FTC shows off the first mobile phone, which will be preloaded with Facebook's new Home app when it goes on sale later this months

WHAT IS HOME?

The free software can be downloaded to recent Andoid handsets and take over its homescreen and menu system to show updates without having to launch a Facebook app.
It also contains a new chat system, and integrates the firm's Instagram app to allow pictures to be shared easily.
'This application erodes any idea of privacy' wrote Malik. 
'If you install this, then it is very likely that Facebook is going to be able to track your every move, and every little action.'
'Facebook itself is a triumph of mediocrity,' said Wired.
Others said the move was simply a way to show users more ads..
Jan Dawson, chief telecoms analyst at Ovum, said: 'To Facebook, this is about becoming more deeply embedded in the operating system on mobile devices, and creating a broader platform.
'Since Facebook doesn't make an operating system for mobile devices, this is the next best thing. It will allow Facebook to track more of a user's behaviour on devices, and present more opportunities to serve up advertising, which is Facebook's main business model. 
'And that presents the biggest obstacle to success for this experiment: Facebook's objectives and users are once again in conflict.
'Users don't want more advertising or tracking, and Facebook wants to do more of both.'
The free software can be downloaded to handsets and take over its homescreen and menu system to show updates without having to launch a Facebook app.
It will also be preloaded on new handsets, including a HTC handset called First which will be the first 'Facebook phone', and goes on sale on April 12th, when the free app will also launch.

image004.jpg
Facebook phone
The new Facebook Home app takes over the menu system of an Android phone. Users can chat and see emails (left) and also easily post pictures via Instagram and comment without having to load a Facebook app.
'Today we're finally here to talk about the Facebook phone,' said Mark Zuckerberg at the announcement at the firm's Silicon Valley HQ.
'Or more accurately, we are going to talk about how you can turn your Android phone into a great social phone.'
'We are not building a phone and we are not building an operating system but we are are building something that is a whole lot deeper than an ordinary app. 
'We wanted to flip things around so our phones were designed around people and not apps.

'How many times have you pulled out a phone and looked into different apps to see what's going on.
'We want to bring all this content to the front.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg unveiling the Facebook 'home' app at the firm's Silicon Valley HQ
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg unveiling the Facebook 'home' app at the firm's Silicon Valley HQ
Zuckerberg says users can have an experience on Android phones that they can't have on other platforms. 
'We're really proud of Home, we think this is the best version of Facebook there is.'
'Home' comes amid rapid growth in the number of people who access Facebook from phones and tablet computers. 
Of its 1.06billion monthly users, 680million log in to Facebook using a mobile gadget.
The new product is a family of apps designed around people's Facebook connections.
Pictures from your Facebook news feed would take up the entire display screen.
Zuckerberg said users will be seeing the world through people rather than apps.
He gave an example of standing in line at a shop and looking down at the phone to see photos of friends and family. 
image002.jpg
image003.jpg
The new app completely overhauls Facebook's chat system, left, while a new lockscreen, right, completely replaces the normal Android menu system.
The HTC first will be the first handset to launch with Facebook's software preloaded on it 
The HTC first will be the first handset to launch with Facebook's software preloaded on it
'It'll be possible to flip through the items. 
'If there's something you like, just double tap on it to "like" it,' he said.
The home app also includes a radical overhaul of the firm's chat app designed to take on increasing competition from apps such as Snapchat.
The new 'Chatheads' show a friend's head in the corner of the screen whenever a new message appears.
'They're a way you can chat to your friends no matter what you're doing,' said Facebook's Adam Mosseri.
The new app will be available on all recent Android devices, including tablets, the firm said.

The software replaces the normal phone menu with a version designed by Facebook
The software replaces the normal phone menu with a version designed by Facebook
The new Facebook homescreen, which lets users access Facebook, chat with friends or access their apps
The new Facebook homescreen, which lets users access Facebook, chat with friends or access their apps
'What Facebook wants is to put itself at the front of the Android user experience for as many Facebook users as possible and make Facebook more elemental to their customers' experience,' said Forrester analyst Charles Golvin. 
The new Home service won't be available on Apple's iPhone and iPad devices. Apple's iOS and Mac operating systems include features that integrate Facebook's services, but Zuckerberg says doing something like Home would require a closer partnership. 
Apple had no immediate comment. 
The deeper mobile integration will likely help Facebook to attract more mobile advertisers. 
Though mobile ads were a big concern for Facebook's investors even before the company's initial public offering last May, some of the worry has subsided as the company muscles its way into the market. 
Last year, Facebook began showing ads to its mobile audience by shoehorning corporate-sponsored content into users' news feeds, which also include updates from friends and brands they follow.
The new Facebook 'home' app, which turns Android handsets into a Facebook phone
The new Facebook 'home' app, which turns Android handsets into a Facebook phone
Facebook now faces the challenge of showing people mobile ads without annoying or alienating them. 
The mobile advertising market is growing quickly, thanks in large part to Facebook and Twitter, which also entered the space in 2012. 
Research firm eMarketer expects U.S. mobile ad spending to grow 77 per cent this year to $7.29billion, from $4.11billion last year. 
EMarketer said Wednesday that it expects Facebook Inc. to reap $965million in U.S. mobile ad revenue in 2013. 
That's about 2.5 times the $391million in 2012, the first year that Facebook started showing mobile ads. 
Clark Fredricksen, vice president at eMarketer, says: 'There are some clear reasons why a deeper integration with mobile operating systems and handsets make sense for Facebook. 
'At the end of the day, the more deeply Facebook can engage consumers, no matter what device or operating system or handset,' the better. 
Facebook's stock rose 80 cents, or 3.1 per cent, to $27.05 in afternoon trading following the announcement. 
It is still 23 per cent below its initial public offering price of $35.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2304527/Is-Facebook-phone-flop-Zuckerbergs-big-mobile-idea-slammed-critics.html#ixzz2PbOp3uii
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook